Still One Third

First, Trump presented a superbly composed summary of his record (at least five things he did last week.) He also presented the same dedicated pacifist authority, bent on righting a Progressively corrupt government of the United States. He connotes, “swarthy,” with orange highlights, a loving, gunfighter’s daughter’s grandfather.” Still funnier, it works. Marlboro Man of Penn Ave.

Democrats either acknowledge him for bringing up another moral deficiency deserving clarify and an illegal posture or you gagged a few times. What did that was at least a one-night with despising your own Party. It stunned me to watch the Democrats stay planted in their seats, silent. Yes, they oppose every extraordinary dream. On each point, just one or two reps would get up, to demonstrate somethiing of importance to their constituency. Nothing, nothing, nothing, though, compares with hating Donald Trump, and rejecting any sense of right and wrong. D last stood for dumb idea.

Second, higher criticism Press keeps predicting the next “staggering lie” in the Trump administration. They mean some terrible thing going one behind your back. (An amusing one from CNN claimed Trump’s hyperbole, “a hundred billion, more than a hundred billion dollars” only translated to 22 billion that CNN knew of, “and some of those were questionable.” Therefore, we can rest assured that Trump lied. CNN exists for those who want the news filtered down and pre-processed. Who really watched at least 45 minutes of it, consecutively and without commentary?

And still about a third of Americans polled somehow “disapproved of, or strongly so,” what the President said, those who benefit by resisting . That accounts for some Party First, principles second Democrats, plus all the radicals, less than essential government agency chiefs and staff, and government dependents like me (retired) who have heard all sorts of horror stories — every one a Uniparty lie. “He’s gonna end something to hurt seniors!” That is not just used against Trump. It is in fact the same argument used by LBJ in damning Ike’s social welfare reform package. Yep, way back then.